In a surprising/unsurprising turn of events, it appears that Jennifer Aniston has married her jorts wearing beau, her fiance--Justin Theroux. Like there are actual receipts to this--People (and TMZ....not sure which one I should trust more, lol) confirmed it. Surprising, because I would've bet every penny I own that they were not going to get married. Unsurprising, because I figured something like this was going to come up after her failed awards campaign resulted in a) no Oscar nod (but two other "major" nods), b) after said campaign, movie made about 2 million in box office...on an 8 million dollar budget, and c) the only movie she could find, months after stating that she wanted to do more serious roles was a Gary Marshall movie.
So a playa had to do what a playa had to do. That phone wasn't ringing for her, and she kept doing hair infomercials. We all bitched and moaned about it (well, I did)....well she gave us something to talk about. Well done Jen.
They got married yesterday, in Bel Air--with over 70 people as their guests. TMZ got photos of their backyard set up of chairs, etc for the wedding. The big celebs for the wedding were (apparently) Lisa Kudrow, Howard Stern, and Chelsea Handler.
Where are her parents? His parents? Courtney Cox? This is PEOPLE magazine. Obviously this article was given approval by Jennifer/Justin (Jennifer). Sloppy, sloppy.
So....congratulations?! I still side eye the hell out of them......they've been together officially for four years. I don't think they'll last. At the same time--I think they'll last because they seem to be like booty call (but married! now) to each other....him in New York/Texas (wherever his show is filming), her in LA or Cabo. Or wherever she's filming Mother's Day.
And lol, reading the People article.....Jennifer said in a previous interview that Justin would be wearing his gold "name" ring. Lord, I still remember when they debuted their couplehood--with tacky tacky tacky gold name rings. What person, over the age of 25, thinks that's cute?
But I'm glad they're married. Now we won't have to hear about her wedding plans anymore. And we'll see if this'll stop her talking about two certain someone's. Because I'm tired of her talking out of both sides of her mouth. Talk about your jorts wearing husband, and leave your ex and his wife alone.
P.S. I'm wondering how this will be played. Knowing Jennifer/Huvane--this isn't the end (not saying that's a bad thing). We'll be getting little stories about the wedding. I bet you we'll get a cover as well, especially after what happened after the Oscars in 2013--Jennifer was on the cover of People for their Oscar edition, to talk about her wedding that never came. Was she nominated for an Oscar? Hell no. She was presenting...which is what made the whole thing SO tacky. You're an actress, and you can't wait a week to talk about your wedding plans--if you wanted the whole cover THAT bad? Anyway, she (or her sources, whatevs) talked about how she was going to get married in the Spring of 2013. Spring comes and goes, no one notices...until she puts out another article about how she's putting off her wedding because reasons in the summer. And then the Dailymail ran a story about how People scrapped a third cover (I'm thinking because they were promised pictures and po'd)....so yea. This is just the beginning.
Let's start with the bare bones of the story. Jennifer Aniston is still waging her one woman Oscar campaign, so she had an interview with The New York Times. The part I'm going to cover is this, where she talks about her boyfriend who was The One:
“He was my first love — five years we were together. He would have been the one. But I was 25, and I was stupid. He must have sent me Justin to make up for it all.”
Now, I'm covering this story from Life&Style, and I find their title to be hilarious--"Did Jennifer Aniston Diss Brad Pitt When Talking About An Ex Boyfriend?".
Because, of course, it never occurs to Life&Style to ask the question of whether or not Jennifer was dissing Justin Theroux--the guy that she's engaged to. Her true lurve. The guy who converted her from Indian jewelry to Giant Diamond Rings (I knew that tacky ring wasn't her style. I would've told him to bring it back to Cracker Barrel where it belongs). The guy who managed to get her to vacation somewhere other than Cabo for a few days (Italy).
Which she is. Dissing the guy she's engaged to--Justin Theroux. How would you feel if your fiance was giving interviews, romanticizing about the one that got away, when she can't/won't do the same for you. I suppose you'd feel the same as if she said that you weren't the love of her life.
But really. I find it hard not to cast shade on an engaged woman telling the world that an old boyfriend is the one that got away, when she's engaged. And the most romantic thing she's ever said about said fiance is that his eyeballs are beautiful. Like I'd be worried about our future together. What is the point in getting engaged, getting married, if you don't even believe that the person you're marrying is it for you?
Some people don't believe in monogamy. They have no desire to be with the same person for years on end. And that's fine. But don't get engaged/married when you feel the exact opposite of the views that getting engaged/married espouses.
Source: New York Times